Atelier Nine FourStrategy & Operations

Approach & Examples

How I think through an operations problem, start to finish.

The experience that shapes my method, a sample diagnostic you can inspect, and four illustrative cases that each follow the same path: situation, symptoms, diagnosis, design and the measures that would show whether it's working.

Professional experience

Experience that informs how I work.

My background spans executive operations, event and program delivery, and national employee resource group leadership within a large consumer technology organization. That work shaped how I approach competing priorities, cross-functional relationships and the details that keep execution moving.

Executive operations and program delivery

I partnered with senior sales and marketing leaders on executive priorities, events and cross-functional programs. My responsibilities connected leadership preparation, stakeholder communication, vendor coordination and budget reconciliation.

I bring that experience to helping teams clarify responsibilities, anticipate dependencies and keep commitments moving from discussion to delivery.

National leadership and stakeholder alignment

Through national events and employee resource group leadership, I brought colleagues and executive stakeholders together around shared initiatives.

The work required balancing perspectives, aligning responsibilities and maintaining momentum across people with competing demands. It shaped my approach to leading through influence and building a rhythm that supports follow-through.

These examples draw on prior in-house roles and national ERG leadership.

Explore the sample diagnostic

About these cases. These are illustrative composites built to show method. They are not client engagements and make no claims about client results. Verified client work will appear here only with the client's written permission.

Illustrative composite

Community nonprofit

12 staff, 60 volunteers · Stakeholder alignment and program management
Situation
A growing nonprofit running more programs each year with the same small staff and a large volunteer base.
Symptoms
Board, staff and volunteer leads each hold a different version of the program calendar. Decisions get reopened after meetings. Volunteers hear about changes late.
Diagnosis
No single owner for cross-program decisions, and no shared record of what was decided or why.
Design
A one-page decision-rights map, a monthly program review with a fixed agenda, a shared decision log, and a short volunteer update cadence.
What we'd measure
Decisions reopened per month, on-time program launches, volunteer no-show rate, and time leaders spend in coordination meetings.
Illustrative composite

Local retail and e-commerce shop

8 staff · Knowledge systems and operating cadence
Situation
An owner-led shop selling in store and online, where the owner is the answer to almost every question.
Symptoms
The same questions come up daily. New hires take weeks to get up to speed. Promotions launch with missing pieces.
Diagnosis
The operation runs on the owner's memory. Nothing recurring is written down, so every question routes back to one person.
Design
A short library of SOPs for the ten most repeated tasks, a 20-minute weekly team huddle, and a simple launch checklist for promotions.
What we'd measure
Questions routed to the owner per week, new-hire ramp time, and promotion launch errors.
Illustrative composite

Professional services practice

15 people · Leadership operating rhythm
Situation
A partner-led firm where two senior partners split their time between client work and running the practice.
Symptoms
Partners' calendars are full but strategic work keeps slipping. Internal meetings crowd out client time. Follow-ups fall through.
Diagnosis
There's no operating rhythm for the practice itself, so management work happens in the gaps between client meetings.
Design
A weekly partner meeting with a standing agenda, a quarterly priorities review, a decision and action log, and protected blocks for practice work.
What we'd measure
Hours of internal meetings per week, follow-ups closed on time, and progress on quarterly priorities.
Illustrative composite

Creative or marketing agency

20 people · AI adoption and capacity planning
Situation
An agency that bought several AI tools to speed up production and expected margins to improve.
Symptoms
A few people use the tools heavily, most don't, and nobody can say whether output or quality changed.
Diagnosis
The tools were treated as a purchase, not a change. There were no agreed use cases, training or measures of adoption.
Design
A readiness check, three pilot use cases with clear review rules, a short training plan, and a capacity view of where time actually goes.
What we'd measure
Weekly active users per tool, time saved on the pilot use cases, revision rounds per project, and team confidence.

Start with a conversation

Thirty minutes to find out whether the problem is the plan or the system.

A free fit call. No prep needed, no pitch deck. If it isn't a fit, you'll leave with a clearer read on what to fix first.

Request a fit call